Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX110 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5300M

NVIDIA GeForce MX110 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5300M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX110 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5300M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX110 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 85W)
AMD Radeon Pro W5300M 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 24% (1250MHz vs 1006MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 40.10GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX110
0.515 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W5300M +521%
3.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2017
Release Date
Nov 2019
GeForce MX(1xx)
Generation
Radeon Pro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

978 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1006 MHz
Boost Clock
1250 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
40.10GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
256
Shading Units
1280
16
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.048 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.00 GPixel/s
16.10 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.400 TFLOPS
515.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.200 TFLOPS
16.10 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
85W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM108S
GPU Name
Navi 14
N16V-GMR1-S-A2
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XLM
Maxwell
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.02 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
-
6.7 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy