Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega M GH to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 100W)
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 15% (1190MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (204.8GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
Radeon RX Vega M GH +358%
3.656 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Feb 2018
GeForce MX
Generation
Vega
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
IGP

Clock Speeds

937 MHz
Base Clock
1063 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
1024bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
204.8GB/s

Render Config

3
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
24
384
Shading Units
1536
24
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
76.16 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
114.2 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.656 TFLOPS
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.656 TFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
228.5 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP108B
GPU Name
Polaris 22
-
GPU Variant
VegaM XT (C7398773)
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Samsung
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
5 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
208 mm²

Board Design

10W
TDP
100W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy