Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 35W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 40% (1455MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +1021%
8.94 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce MX
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

937 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
3
SM Count
24
384
Shading Units
3072
24
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
69.84 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
139.7 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.940 TFLOPS
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.940 TFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
139.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

10W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP108B
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy