Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W vs AMD Radeon E9171 MCM

NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W vs AMD Radeon E9171 MCM

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX450 25W and 4GB VRAM Radeon E9171 MCM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 40W)
AMD Radeon E9171 MCM 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 31% (1219MHz vs 930MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX450 25W +33%
1.667 TFLOPS
Radeon E9171 MCM
1.248 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2020
Release Date
Oct 2017
GeForce MX
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

720 MHz
Base Clock
1124 MHz
930 MHz
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
512
56
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
52.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
3.333 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
1.667 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
52.08 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
40W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Lexa
N18S-G5
GPU Variant
Lexa MCM Pro
Turing
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy