Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K160Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800

NVIDIA GRID K160Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GRID K160Q and 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K160Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 768GB)
128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (38.40GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
Lower TDP (59W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K160Q +85%
0.326 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1800
0.176 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Mar 2009
GRID
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
768MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
192
Shading Units
64
16
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
48 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
176.0 GFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

130W
TDP
59W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
G94
-
GPU Variant
G94 GL-U
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy