Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K160Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M

NVIDIA GRID K160Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GRID K160Q and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K160Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
120 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (35.20GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
Lower TDP (45W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K160Q +101%
0.326 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1800M
0.162 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Jun 2009
GRID
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
550 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
35.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
9
192
Shading Units
72
16
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.488 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.46 GTexel/s
-
-
-
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
162.0 GFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

130W
TDP
45W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GT215
-
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM4
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy