Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K160Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

NVIDIA GRID K160Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GRID K160Q and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K160Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
64 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
Lower TDP (100W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K160Q
0.326 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3800M +29%
0.422 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Aug 2008
GRID
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
192
Shading Units
128
16
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

130W
TDP
100W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
N10E-GLM3-B2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy