Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K160Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

NVIDIA GRID K160Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GRID K160Q and 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K160Q
0.326 TFLOPS
Quadro K3100M +232%
1.084 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Jul 2013
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
192
Shading Units
768
16
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.30 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
45.18 GTexel/s
-
-
-
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1084 GFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.18 GFLOPS

Board Design

130W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N15E-Q1-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy