Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K160Q vs NVIDIA RTX A6000

NVIDIA GRID K160Q vs NVIDIA RTX A6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GRID K160Q and 48GB VRAM RTX A6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K160Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (130W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX A6000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1800MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
10560 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K160Q
0.326 TFLOPS
RTX A6000 +11774%
38.71 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Oct 2020
GRID
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1800 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
84
192
Shading Units
10752
16
TMUs
336
16
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
336
-
RT Cores
84
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
201.6 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
604.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
38.71 TFLOPS
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
38.71 TFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
604.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

130W
TDP
300W
300 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GA102
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy