Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM GRID K200 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K200 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Lower TDP (62W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K200 +376%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000
0.48 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Dec 2010
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
1536
Shading Units
192
128
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
62W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy