Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K520 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600

NVIDIA GRID K520 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K520 and 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K520 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
1440 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (134W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K520 +895%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Mar 2007
GRID
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
67.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
12
1536
Shading Units
96
128
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
96 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
230.4 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

225W
TDP
134W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
G80
-
GPU Variant
G80-850-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.0
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy