Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K520 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2

NVIDIA GRID K520 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K520 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 4700 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K520 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (225W vs 226W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K520 +496%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4700 X2
0.384 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Apr 2008
GRID
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
1536
Shading Units
128
128
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

225W
TDP
226W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
G92-880-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy