Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID M3 3020 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

NVIDIA GRID M3 3020 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID M3 3020 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID M3 3020 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1306MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (83.20GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
608 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID M3 3020 +1990%
1.672 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2016
Release Date
Jun 2007
GRID
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

1033 MHz
Base Clock
-
1306 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
83.20GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
640
Shading Units
32
40
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.90 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
52.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.672 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
52.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.1
6.7 (5.1)
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy