Intel H3C XG310 vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 45% (2250MHz vs 1550MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
4352 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+867%
23.04 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
Mar 2023
H3C Graphics
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
1725 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
12GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
40
768
Shading Units
5120
48
TMUs
160
24
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
360.0 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
23.04 TFLOPS
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
360.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
100W
700 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
AD104
-
-
-
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
5 nm
Unknown
Transistors
35.8 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
