Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
7296 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 's Advantages
Boost Clock1650MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M
+398%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
2.957 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Jun 2020
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1395 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
8192
Shading Units
896
256
TMUs
56
128
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.40 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.914 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.957 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
50W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
TU117B
-
GPU Variant
N19P-Q1-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
