Home GPU Comparison ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 vs NVIDIA GeForce 310M

ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 vs NVIDIA GeForce 310M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Mobility FireGL V5700 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 310M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (22.40GB/s vs 10.67GB/s)
104 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 310M 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Mobility FireGL V5700 +193%
0.144 TFLOPS
GeForce 310M
0.049 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Jan 2010
Mobility FireGL
Generation
GeForce 300M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
667 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
10.67GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
3
Compute Units
-
120
Shading Units
16
8
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.424 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.848 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
48.96 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

M86
GPU Name
GT218
M86-M GL (216-0683008)
GPU Variant
N11M-GE1
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.378 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
135 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
14W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
4.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy