Home GPU Comparison ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2700 vs AMD FirePro M3900

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2700 vs AMD FirePro M3900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Mobility Radeon HD 2700 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2700 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (22.40GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
AMD FirePro M3900 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
40 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Mobility Radeon HD 2700
0.168 TFLOPS
FirePro M3900 +42%
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2007
Release Date
Oct 2010
M7x
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
160
8
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.000 GPixel/s
5.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
168.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

M76
GPU Name
Seymour
-
GPU Variant
Seymour GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
0.37 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy