Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 300 vs AMD FirePro W8100

NVIDIA NVS 300 vs AMD FirePro W8100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 300 and 8GB VRAM FirePro W8100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 220W)
AMD FirePro W8100 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
2544 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
FirePro W8100 +10717%
4.219 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Jun 2014
NVS
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
40
16
Shading Units
2560
8
TMUs
160
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.74 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
131.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.219 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.109 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Hawaii
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL40
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Board Design

18W
TDP
220W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy