Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

NVIDIA NVS 300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 300 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power +4587%
1.828 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Mar 2016
NVS
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1026 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.08 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
-
-
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

18W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
GM206
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
GM206-251-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
5.2
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy