Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 310 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

NVIDIA NVS 310 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 310 and 16GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 190W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7700 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2600MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
3024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7700 +31850%
31.95 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Nov 2023
NVS
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2600 MHz
875 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
48
1
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
3072
8
TMUs
192
4
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
48
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
249.6 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
499.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
63.90 TFLOPS
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.95 TFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
190W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
Navi 32
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 32
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
28.1 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
346 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy