Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 310 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GTO

NVIDIA NVS 310 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GTO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 310 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GTO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.00GB/s vs 12.54GB/s)
48 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Dec 2007
NVS
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
875 MHz
Memory Clock
392 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
12.54GB/s

Render Config

1
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
48
Shading Units
-
8
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.348 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.348 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
RV530
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
RV530 LE
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
90 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²

Board Design

20W
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x HDMI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy