Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA P102 101 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

NVIDIA P102 101 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 10GB VRAM P102 101 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA P102 101 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 0% (1670MHz vs 1665MHz)
More VRAM (10GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.3GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
P102 101 +258%
10.69 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2018
Release Date
Apr 2019
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1557 MHz
Base Clock
1485 MHz
1670 MHz
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
2002 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

10GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.3GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
25
SM Count
14
3200
Shading Units
896
200
TMUs
56
80
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
0 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

133.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
53.28 GPixel/s
334.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.24 GTexel/s
167.0 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.967 TFLOPS
10.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.984 TFLOPS
334.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
93.24 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
TU117
GP102-101-A1
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
12 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy