Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA P102 101 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

NVIDIA P102 101 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 10GB VRAM P102 101 and 16GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA P102 101 's Advantages
128 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon PRO W7700 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 56% (2600MHz vs 1670MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 10GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 320.3GB/s)
Lower TDP (190W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
P102 101
10.69 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7700 +198%
31.95 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2018
Release Date
Nov 2023
Mining GPUs
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1557 MHz
Base Clock
1900 MHz
1670 MHz
Boost Clock
2600 MHz
2002 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

10GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.3GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
48
25
SM Count
-
3200
Shading Units
3072
200
TMUs
192
80
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
48
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
0 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

133.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
249.6 GPixel/s
334.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
499.2 GTexel/s
167.0 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
63.90 TFLOPS
10.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.95 TFLOPS
334.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
190W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
Navi 32
GP102-101-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 32
Pascal
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
5 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
28.1 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
346 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy