Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 232 vs NVIDIA NVS 310

NVIDIA PG506 232 vs NVIDIA NVS 310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 232 and 512MB VRAM NVS 310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
3536 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 165W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
PG506 232 +10220%
10.32 TFLOPS
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jun 2012
Tesla
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR3
3072bit
Memory Bus
64bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s

Render Config

56
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
3584
Shading Units
48
224
TMUs
8
96
ROPs
4
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
24 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
GF119
-
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Board Design

165W
TDP
20W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
2.1
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy