Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 242 vs AMD Radeon R7 360

NVIDIA PG506 242 vs AMD Radeon R7 360

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 242 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 242 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 37% (1440MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 360 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 165W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
PG506 242 +539%
10.32 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 360
1.613 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jun 2015
Tesla
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
3072bit
Memory Bus
128bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
768
224
TMUs
48
96
ROPs
16
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
24 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.80 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.613 TFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
100.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

165W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
Tobago
-
GPU Variant
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy