Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI50

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI50

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI50 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI50 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1746MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1020GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
3648 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000
0.48 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI50 +2693%
13.41 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
Nov 2018
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1746 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
1020GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
60
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
3840
32
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
111.7 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
419.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.82 TFLOPS
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.41 TFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.705 TFLOPS

Board Design

62W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
Vega 20
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Vega 20 GLXT
Fermi
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy