Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

NVIDIA Quadro 2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 2000M and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2112 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000M
0.422 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200 +741%
3.553 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
667 MHz
-
Boost Clock
771 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
192
Shading Units
2304
32
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
422.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
GK110B
N12P-Q3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.1
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy