Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c

NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 and 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (5GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
2448 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
Tesla K20c +3162%
3.524 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
770 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
5GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
320bit
12.32GB/s
Bandwidth
208.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
2496
16
TMUs
208
8
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.71 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
146.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
108.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.524 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1175 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
GK110
GT216 GL
GPU Variant
GK110-885-KA-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.2
CUDA
3.5
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy