Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000

NVIDIA Quadro 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 and 12GB VRAM Quadro M6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (142W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Quadro M6000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1114MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000
0.486 TFLOPS
Quadro M6000 +1308%
6.844 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2010
Release Date
Mar 2015
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
988 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1114 MHz
702 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
317.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
-
256
Shading Units
3072
32
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
106.9 GPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
213.9 GTexel/s
-
-
-
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.844 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
213.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

142W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GM200
GF100-825-A3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
8 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
601 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy