Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

NVIDIA Quadro 6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro 6000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 6000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (143.4GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Lower TDP (55W vs 204W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 6000 +79%
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
747 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
143.4GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
384
56
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

204W
TDP
55W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GK107
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy