Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380

NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro CX 's Advantages
More VRAM (1536GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
176 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro CX +1220%
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro CX
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

24
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
192
Shading Units
16
64
TMUs
8
24
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
192 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.600 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
G96
-
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
34W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy