CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA RTX A2000
NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA RTX A2000
VS
NVIDIA Quadro CX
NVIDIA RTX A2000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX and 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
3136 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
RTX A2000
+1628%
7.987 TFLOPS
Quadro CX
VS
RTX A2000
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Aug 2021
Quadro CX
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
562 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
26
192
Shading Units
3328
64
TMUs
104
24
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
104
-
RT Cores
26
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
70W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GA106
-
GPU Variant
GA106-850-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
12 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
2
NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
3
NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB
4
NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB
5
NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Tesla K10
6
NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA GRID K280Q
7
NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800
8
NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M
9
NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA GRID M60 1Q
10
NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Tesla M4
Related News
1
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
2
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
3
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
4
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
5
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
6
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
7
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
8
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
9
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
10
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy