Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA GRID K280Q

NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA GRID K280Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX and 4GB VRAM GRID K280Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro CX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K280Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
GRID K280Q +395%
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro CX
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

24
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
192
Shading Units
1536
64
TMUs
128
24
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
192 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
225W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.3
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy