Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 51W)
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
352 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000 +816%
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
51W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GK107
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy