Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M vs NVIDIA GRID K200

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M vs NVIDIA GRID K200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800M and 256MB VRAM GRID K200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Lower TDP (45W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K200 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
1464 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1800M
0.162 TFLOPS
GRID K200 +1312%
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2009
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
550 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
35.20GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
9
SM Count
-
72
Shading Units
1536
24
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.488 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
13.46 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
162.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
GK104
N10P-GLM4
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.2
CUDA
3.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy