Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800M and 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 260W)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (604.8GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
4536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1800M
0.162 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 16 +7838%
12.86 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2009
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
550 MHz
Memory Clock
1575 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
35.20GB/s
Bandwidth
604.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
9
SM Count
72
72
Shading Units
4608
24
TMUs
288
8
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.488 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
133.9 GPixel/s
13.46 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
401.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
25.71 TFLOPS
162.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.86 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
401.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
260W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
TU102
N10P-GLM4
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy