Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800M and 16GB VRAM Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1530MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (897.0GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
5048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1800M
0.162 TFLOPS
Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB +9572%
15.67 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2009
Release Date
Mar 2018
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1327 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1530 MHz
550 MHz
Memory Clock
876 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
35.20GB/s
Bandwidth
897.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
9
SM Count
80
72
Shading Units
5120
24
TMUs
320
8
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.488 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
195.8 GPixel/s
13.46 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.33 TFLOPS
162.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.67 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
7.834 TFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
GV100
N10P-GLM4
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
7.0
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy