Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 122W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
1488 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 2700M
0.127 TFLOPS
Quadro K5000 SYNC +1607%
2.169 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Jan 2013
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
799 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.14GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

6
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
48
Shading Units
1536
24
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

8.480 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.59 GPixel/s
12.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
90.37 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
127.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.169 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
90.37 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G94
GPU Name
GK104
NB9E-GLM2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

65W
TDP
122W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
-
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy