Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 247W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
Tesla C2075 +542%
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
799 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
51.14GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
14
64
Shading Units
448
32
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
16.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
-
-
160.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
247W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
GF110
NB8E-GLM3
GPU Variant
GF110-351-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
3 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
2.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy