CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 370 LP and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 60W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
2552 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 370 LP
0.017 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded
+48447%
8.253 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 370 LP
VS
RTX A2000 Embedded
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1117 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
1
SM Count
20
8
Shading Units
2560
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
2.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
17.28 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
60W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G98
GPU Name
GA107S
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
Unknown
86 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
2
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive
3
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA A10G
4
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile
5
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
6
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA Tesla C2070
7
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4
8
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
9
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
10
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
Related News
1
AMD's Thunderous Strike: Ryzen 9 9950X3D Performance Scores Revealed for the First Time!
2
Continuous Decline in DRAM Memory Prices: Downward Trend Intensifies
3
NVIDIA GB202 Chip Unveiled for the First Time, to be Used in RTX 5090 with 512-bit GDDR7 Memory
4
Strix Halo Integrated Graphics Score Appears on Passmark, Currently Slightly Below RTX 3060 12GB
5
AMD Unveils New RX 9070 XT Graphics Card Performance: Positioned Between RX 7900 GRE and RX 7900 XT
6
Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card
7
CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory
8
CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production
9
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
10
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy