CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA A10G
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA A10G
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
NVIDIA A10G
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 370 LP and 12GB VRAM A10G to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 150W)
NVIDIA A10G 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1710MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
9208 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 370 LP
0.017 TFLOPS
A10G
+185311%
31.52 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 370 LP
VS
A10G
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1320 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1710 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
12GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
1
SM Count
72
8
Shading Units
9216
4
TMUs
288
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
164.2 GPixel/s
2.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
492.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.52 TFLOPS
17.28 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.52 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
985.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
G98
GPU Name
GA102
-
GPU Variant
GA102-890-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro GP100
2
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile
3
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA GRID K340
4
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216
5
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250
6
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA Tesla K20m
7
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro K420
8
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q
9
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA GRID K280Q
10
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE
Related News
1
AMD's Thunderous Strike: Ryzen 9 9950X3D Performance Scores Revealed for the First Time!
2
Continuous Decline in DRAM Memory Prices: Downward Trend Intensifies
3
NVIDIA GB202 Chip Unveiled for the First Time, to be Used in RTX 5090 with 512-bit GDDR7 Memory
4
Strix Halo Integrated Graphics Score Appears on Passmark, Currently Slightly Below RTX 3060 12GB
5
AMD Unveils New RX 9070 XT Graphics Card Performance: Positioned Between RX 7900 GRE and RX 7900 XT
6
Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card
7
CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory
8
CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production
9
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
10
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy