Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 370 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
7664 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 370
0.023 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T +59986%
13.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2007
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro FX
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
7680
8
TMUs
240
4
ROPs
120
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.440 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
2.880 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
23.04 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
500W
200 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
80 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
8 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy