Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 370 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.60GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
560 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 370
0.023 TFLOPS
Quadro K3000M +3173%
0.753 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2007
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
576
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.440 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.848 GPixel/s
2.880 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.39 GTexel/s
-
-
-
23.04 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
753.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
31.39 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N14E-Q1-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy