Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 LP and 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 160W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (416.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2288 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380 LP
0.044 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 4000 +16079%
7.119 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
Nov 2018
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1005 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
416.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
36
16
Shading Units
2304
8
TMUs
144
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
4.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.24 TFLOPS
44.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.119 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
222.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

28W
TDP
160W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
TU104
GT218 GL
GPU Variant
TU104-850-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy