Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 LP and 6GB VRAM RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 60W)
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1140MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (132.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2544 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380 LP
0.044 TFLOPS
RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB +13165%
5.837 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
652 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1140 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
96bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
132.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
20
16
Shading Units
2560
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.48 GPixel/s
4.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
91.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.837 TFLOPS
44.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.837 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
91.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

28W
TDP
60W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
GA107
GT218 GL
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy