Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 LP and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 80W)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
5872 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380 LP
0.044 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Embedded +32422%
14.31 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
510 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
46
16
Shading Units
5888
8
TMUs
184
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.6 GPixel/s
4.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
223.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.31 TFLOPS
44.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.31 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
223.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

28W
TDP
80W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
GA104
GT218 GL
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy