Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 LP and 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 165W)
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
7408 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380 LP
0.044 TFLOPS
RTX A5500 Mobile +50513%
22.27 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
975 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
58
16
Shading Units
7424
8
TMUs
232
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
232
-
RT Cores
58
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
4.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
348.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.27 TFLOPS
44.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.27 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
348.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

28W
TDP
165W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
GA103
GT218 GL
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
22 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
496 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy