NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro K4000M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.60GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
944 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
Quadro K4000M
+3197%
1.154 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
960
8
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.02 GPixel/s
3.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.08 GTexel/s
-
-
-
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1154 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
48.08 GFLOPS
Board Design
34W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
G96
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N14E-Q3-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
