Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M vs NVIDIA GRID M60 4A

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M vs NVIDIA GRID M60 4A

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800M and 4GB VRAM GRID M60 4A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID M60 4A 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock1178MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3800M
0.422 TFLOPS
GRID M60 4A +1043%
4.825 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
557 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
128
Shading Units
2048
64
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.39 GPixel/s
43.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
422.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.825 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
150.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
GM204
N10E-GLM3-B2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy