Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 SDI vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 SDI vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 SDI and 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.60GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 154W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600 SDI
0.23 TFLOPS
Quadro K3000M +227%
0.753 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2007
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

768MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
576
24
TMUs
48
24
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
96 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.848 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.39 GTexel/s
-
-
-
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
753.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
31.39 GFLOPS

Board Design

154W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N14E-Q1-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.0
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy